Legal Opinion

McKelvy v. Darnell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 13, 1991No. 1900273PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves two issues: (1) Whether a party, by failing to object to a question asked of a witness during a deposition, can nevertheless object to the question when the deposition is being read into evidence at the trial, and (2) whether the trial judged erred in permitting a state trooper to testify as an expert witness and give his opinion as to the speed of a motor vehicle involved in an accident.

The plaintiff, Kermit McKelvy, sued the defendant, Arthur Bailey Darnell, claiming damages for injuries he allegedly suffered in an automobile accident that occurred on Highway 33 in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle Jordan v. Lawrence MedleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Maslankowski v. Beam Ex Rel. QuernemeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Bell v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Dyer v. TraegerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Townsend v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Tillis Trucking Co., Inc. v. MosesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Britton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API