Legal Opinion
Romano v. Romano
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 16, 1967PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The parties were married on January 6, 1950. Plaintiff alleges her consent to the marriage was induced by fraudulent representations of defendant and she left him in August, 1950, promptly on discovery of the fraud. This action *446was not commenced, however, until November, 1964, more than 14 years after her discovery of the fraud. Defendant husband defaulted and has never appeared in the action.
The Appellate Division was of opinion the fraud had been sufficiently shown; but it affirmed the dismissal of the action by the court at Special Term on the ground the three-year period fixed for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Wightman v. WightmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Wheatland v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Tanges v. Heidelberg North America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Yonkers Contracting Co. v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Penina Fishman, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Michelle Fishman Michelle Fishman, Individually v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.