Legal Opinion
Krauser v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 6, 2011No. 10-5103PublishedCited by 368 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Richard F. Krauser appeals from a district court order, issued by the magistrate judge on consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. We independently review the Commissioner’s decision to determine whether it is free from legal error and supported by substantial evidence, Fischer-Ross v. Barnhart, 431 F.3d 729, 731 (10th Cir.2005), though “our review ... is limited to the issues the claimant properly preserves in the district court and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Watkins v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Langley v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by368 opinions
- Chapo v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Brownrigg v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Angela Farrell v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Smart v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Adams Ex Rel. D.J.W. v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
363 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.