Legal Opinion

State v. Latendresse

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1990No. Cr. 890285PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Orville Latendresse appeals from a county court judgment which found him guilty of issuing a check without sufficient funds. We dismiss the appeal.

On May 8, 1989, Latendresse issued a $15.00 check to the Morris Bar in Drake, North Dakota. After the check was re: turned “N.S.F.”, indicating non-sufficient funds, Roy Bell, the owner of the bar, signed a criminal complaint against Laten-dresse. At the August 8, 1989, bench trial, Latendresse was found guilty of issuing a check without sufficient funds.

On August 23, 1989, Latendresse filed with the clerk of the county court a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Routledge v. RoutledgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MathisenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HounNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Leftbear v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. FranckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. LatendresseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API