Legal Opinion
Austin C. Palmer and Helen M. Palmer, Husband and Wife v. Gladys S. Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 16, 1974No. 73-1936, 73-2705, 73-2706PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Austin and Helen Palmer brought this action under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1665, to recover the statutory penalty and attorney fees provided in section 1640 and to enforce their right of rescission pursuant to section 1635. The district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and awarded both forms of relief requested; the defendants appeal.
The record before the district court at the time of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment revealed that the note signed by the Palmers and the Broker’s Loan Statement with which they…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Betty Eby, a Widow v. Reb Realty, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, and Don Dailey Realty, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Palmer v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Ljepya v. M. L. S. C. PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
3Cited by97 opinions
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Theresa Plant v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc. Of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Mildred Ives v. W. T. Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Melvin T. Yamamoto Elaine S. Yamamoto Maxine H. Tampon v. Bank of New York Bnc Mortgage U.S. Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.