Legal Opinion
Ljepya v. M. L. S. C. Properties
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 19, 1973No. C-72-2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WYZANSKI, District Judge, sitting by designation.
The issue is the meaning of the term “itemized” as used in § 1639(a)(2) of Title 15 U¡S.C., referred to as the Federal Truth in Lending Act or The Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. This court has clear jurisdiction. 15 U.S.C. § 1640(e).
Plaintiffs, landowners, are borrowers; defendant Lopes, a real estate agent, acted for them and for defendant Paulson, a real estate broker, and defendants HLC and M.L.S.C. Properties, Inc. which created a trust to hold a mortgage for the benefit of numerous individual defendants. These are…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Austin C. Palmer and Helen M. Palmer, Husband and Wife v. Gladys S. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Sosa v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Starks v. Orleans Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
- Nick Ljepava and Chris Ljepava, Jr., and v. M.L.S.C. Properties, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.