Lord v. Mansfield
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*23 Opinion
FOTI, J.
In the first of these consolidated appeals, the plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs complaint and on the defendants’ counterclaim. The second appeal is the plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s judgment of civil contempt. In the first appeal (17122), the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) excluded evidence, (2) limited the plaintiffs testimony, (3) refused to hear rebuttal evidence, (4) denied the plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint and (5) concluded that the plaintiffs actions were…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Kramer v. PetisiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. GanimConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Perkins v. Colonial Cemeteries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.