Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. Grourke
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff UNUM Life Insurance Company of America’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. 13). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny UNUM’s motion. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
BACKGROUND
The facts in the present case are relatively undisputed. Michael J. Grourke, Jr. began employment with Honeywell, Inc. on January 29,1962. On or about January 1, 1995, Mr. Grourke became a participant in a fully-insured employee benefit welfare plan under Group Long-Term…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MURPHY v. HUB PARKING TECHNOLOGY USA, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024