Legal Opinion
Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 2, 1998No. Civ. 97-515 (DSD/JMM)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, the court grants in part and denies in part defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff James W. Parkhill is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida. 1 Defendant Minnesota Mutual is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in Minnesota. Defendant sells many types of whole or other permanent life insurance policies to individuals,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Casa Clara Condo. Ass'n v. Charley Toppino and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
- HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas CostarricensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- James W. Parkhill, an Individual, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Cooper v. Berkshire Life InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.