Legal Opinion
Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1999No. Civ.A.97-515 DSD/JMMPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff James Parkhill for class certification. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated, the court denies plaintiffs motion.
BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff is a Florida resident who seeks compensatory and equitable relief on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated plaintiffs he seeks to represent for defendant’s alleged fraudulent conduct and deceptive sales scheme in the marketing and sale of “vanishing premium” insurance policies.2 Amended Complaint 113. In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- James W. Parkhill, an Individual, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.