Legal Opinion

In re Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. 2000-0906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 63.] IN RE ANDERSON. [Cite as In re Anderson,

2001-Ohio-131.] Juvenile court—Delinquency proceedings—Juvenile court proceeding is a civil action. (No. 00-906—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided June 13, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, Nos. 99-CA-90 and 99-CA-91. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT A juvenile court proceeding is a civil action. __________________ FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J. {¶ 1} In August and September 1997, two complaints were filed in the Clark County Juvenile Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bond v. Village of Canal Winchester, 07ap-556 (3-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In Matter of K.B., Ca2006-03-077 (4-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Beltz v. Beltz, Unpublished Decision (2-27-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Frazier v. Cincinnati School of Med. Massage, C-060359 (5-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API