Legal Opinion

Security Savings Bank v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court.— Hon. J. H. Preston, Judge. Suit in equity to enjoin the county treasurer from enforcing an assessment of property made under section 1371 of the Code. There was a judgment for the plaintiff on demurrer to an amendment to the- petition and to the answer to the original petition. The defendants appeal.—

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, J.—

In December, 1903, the appellant, C. D. Carroll, as treasurer of Linn county, listed and assessed against the appellee, as agent for others who were not named, moneys, loans, and credits alleged to have been omitted from taxation for the years 1899 to 1902 inclusive. The plaintiff in this.action seeks to restrain the treasurer from collecting, or attempting to collect, the tax so assessed by him. By an amendment to the petition the plaintiff also seeks to restrain the appellant from making a proposed similar assessment for the year 1903. The original petition alleged that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Galusha v. WendtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Schoonover v. PetcinaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Stevens v. CarrollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Barber v. FarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fairley v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Way v. BarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Longstreet v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Woodbine Savings Bank v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Judy v. National State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API