Legal Opinion

Longstreet v. Town of Sharon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

In the year 1921, the town of Sharon was constructing a sewerage system and disposal plant. It had not acquired the land for the disposal plant or i*r the outlet therefor, Appellees herein, Longstreet and Jones, owned certain land, a part .of which was to be crossed by the main sewer leading to the disposal plant, an¿ other part of which was to be crossed by the outlet leading from the disposal plant.

The condemnation proceedings instituted before the sheriff seem to be regular in all respects, and due and timely notice was served on the town. The sheriff’s jury awarded a lump sum of $10,000…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bennett v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Lull v. Anamosa National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Haggard v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Kosters v. Sioux CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Kukkuk v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Crist v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Duggan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Crozier v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API