Legal Opinion
Robert v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 18, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-0121PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KATZ, District Judge.
Facts
Plaintiffs, Robert and Elizabeth Butler, filed this suit seeking judicial review of a determination by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that they do not qualify under 12 U.S.C. § 1715u (1982) for participation in HUD’s Mortgage Assignment Program. Mr. and Mrs. Butler petition this court to set aside HUD’s decision and either order the agency to accept assignment of their mortgage or in the alternative, remand the matter for a new administrative hearing. In addition, plaintiffs request this court to enjoin the Federal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Transamerican Trailer Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Continental Group, Inc. v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- James and Joyce Ferrell v. Samuel R. Pierce, Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Ferrell v. PierceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Santos v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Santos)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Zaidi v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Zaidi)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Rickards v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ruiz v. New Garden TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Rickards v. US DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985