Legal Opinion
Rickards v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 5, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-2226PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, William and Colette Rickards, seek judicial review of the decision of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) rejecting their application for an assignment of their mortgage. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, I will remand the matter to HUD for reconsideration.
In April 1983, plaintiffs purchased a home with a loan secured by a mortgage which was assigned to mortgagee Southeast Mortgage Company in May 1983. The mortgage was insured by HUD pursuant to § 221(d)(2) of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Leonard P. Matlovich v. Secretary of the Air Force and Colonel Alton J. ThogersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Rita M. Anderson v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGonigel's, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Madison v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Madison)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Rickards v. US DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985