Legal Opinion
Santos v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Santos)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1989No. 19-11107PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE I. FOX, Bankruptcy Judge:
The instant adversary proceeding challenges a proof of claim filed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In so doing, it raises difficult questions regarding the effect of a chapter 13 proceeding on the mortgage assignment program operated by HUD.
On July 9,1987 the debtors filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under chapter 13. Thereafter, HUD filed a proof of claim, in accordance with local Bankr.R. 3001.1(b), which stated that the amount needed by the debtors to cure their prepetition mortgage arrearage was $25,110.88 and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In the Matter of Benny L. ROACH and Edith Roach, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Triangle Laboratories, Inc. v. HalvajianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Brown v. LynnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- James and Joyce Ferrell v. Samuel R. Pierce, Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Epps v. Lomas Mortgage USA, Inc. (In Re Epps)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- R.C.R. Services, Inc. v. Sciortino (In Re Sciortino)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Blakeney v. Benefact Mortgage (In Re Blakeney)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Stendardo v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Stendardo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Armstead v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Armstead)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.