Abrahamson v. Burnett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action is based upon a written indemnity contract. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that a recovery could be had. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,901.43, from which the defendant appeals.
The facts are these: The Burnett Construction Company was a corporation engaged in the contracting business. It desired a credit at the Scandinavian American Bank at Seattle to the extent of $10,000, which the bank was unwilling to give without a guaranty. April 21, 1916, Andrew Peterson,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daly v. RizzuttoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Sheard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- City of Seattle v. John C. Regan & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Handsaker v. PedersenWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- National Surety Co. v. Fry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- Newcomer v. MasiniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Dixon v. Fiat-Roosevelt Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- O'Toole v. Empire Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Rowland v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.