Legal Opinion

Morehouse v. Wanzo

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1968No. Civ. No. 25290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Plaintiff, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, has appealed from that portion of a judgment which denied him relief against a defaulting defendant. It appears, on the record, that the court erred in ruling that the complaint failed to state a cause of action because of the prohibitions of the Labor Code.1 The judgment must be reversed.

Plaintiff, a laborer employed by a subcontractor engaging in pouring and finishing concrete on a construction job, sought, by his first amended complaint to recover damages from the general contractor and the latter’s employee Wanzo. The…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Saala v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morehouse v. WanzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API