Morehouse v. Wanzo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
Plaintiff, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, has appealed from that portion of a judgment which denied him relief against a defaulting defendant. It appears, on the record, that the court erred in ruling that the complaint failed to state a cause of action because of the prohibitions of the Labor Code.1 The judgment must be reversed.
Plaintiff, a laborer employed by a subcontractor engaging in pouring and finishing concrete on a construction job, sought, by his first amended complaint to recover damages from the general contractor and the latter’s employee Wanzo. The…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Saala v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morehouse v. WanzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968