Chambersburg Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

I concur in the determination further review of this matter was improvidently granted, writing only to explain my reservations regarding the lower court’s resolution of this matter. While I agree with *191concerns raised by Justice Wecht in his Dissenting Statement, I respectfully do not believe this matter is the appropriate vehicle to define the scope of the secondary boycott provision of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act (PLRA), 43 P.S. §§ 211.1-211.13.

Like all courts with discretionary review dockets, this Court attempts to identify cases of broad import or interest for review. See…