United States v. Miller
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
*302DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
2Per curiam
The record of trial in this case was considered by this Court in our previous decision, United States v. Miller, 1 M.J. 798 (A.F.C.M.R.1976), wherein we noted that, in an otherwise adequate post-trial review, the staff judge advocate erroneously indicated the accused had pleaded guilty to the offenses charged. In the circumstances, and in light of cases cited, we were compelled to hold the review prejudicially erroneous. Pursuant to the direction of The Judge Advocate General, the previous action of the convening authority was withdrawn, and a new review and action…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. PetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. DavicU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. BatesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.