United States v. Miller
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
We granted accused’s petition for review on a question relating to the sentence that was then pending disposition in United States v. Mosely, 1 M.J. 350 (1976).
Represented by civilian counsel, the accused pleaded guilty to, and was found guilty of, assault with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm. In argument as to the sentence, defense counsel urged, primarily, that no punitive discharge be imposed. Reviewing the factors that the court members might consider in their deliberations on the sentence, he referred to “deterrence.” Counsel remarked that society should exact…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. HeflinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
4Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. MyhrbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. VaracalleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. DavicU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. CreditU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. BatesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.