Brian McCarthy Gayle Hartmann Alma Williams Roberta Delaney v. Lee M. Thomas City of Tucson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WIGGINS.
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs below (“Appellants”) sought from the district court an order requiring the cities of Tucson and Phoenix to enlarge their mass transit systems. Specifically, Appellants asserted that Tucson and Phoenix must comply with certain mass transit proposals that Arizona submitted to the EPA in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The district court disagreed with Appellants and entered summary judgment for the cities. We reverse.
I
A. Statutory Framework
As amended in 1970, the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) required the EPA to establish national ambient air…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lois Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sierra Club v. KorleskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Sweat v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- (PC) Khademi v. NielsenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Sierra Club v. KorleskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012