Legal Opinion
Sweat v. Hull
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 12, 2001No. 2:00-cv-01680PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for. lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having considered the arguments and evidence offered by the parties in their pleadings and at oral argument, the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and deny both of Defendants’ Motions.
Background
On August 31, 2000, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against Defendant Jane Hull (“Hull”), in her capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, and Defendant Jacqueline Schafer (“Schafer”), in her capacity as…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tohono O'odham Nation v. DuceyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Jordahl v. BrnovichDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- St. Bernard Citizens for Environmental Quality, Inc. v. Chalmette Refining, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
- Kentucky Resources Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2004
- Clean Air Council v. MalloryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.