Denson v. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The bill discloses that the mortgage on complainants’ realty was duly foreclosed by the mortgagee defendant pursuant to the power of sale therein contained. Such sale cut off the equity of redemption, and vested in the purchaser the legal title, leaving in the complainants only the statutory right of redemption. Allison v. Cody, 206 Ala. 88, 89 So. 238; Irby v. Commercial National Bank, 203 Ala. 228, 82 So. 478.
Such a right is not property or a property right, but a privilege merely (section 10156, Code 1923; Allison v. Cody, supra) to be exercised by the proper party in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Harmon v. Dothan Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Shaup v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Hayden v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Allison v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Garvich v. Associates Financial Services Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Long v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Duncan v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Brown v. BatehSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Land v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.