Legal Opinion

Shaup v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1931No. 6 Div. 811PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The bill was filed by appellant a locomotive engineer employed by the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway (hereinafter for convenience-designated Frisco) against the Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, an unincorporated labor union of which he is a member, the local division of the union, two nonresident individuals as officers of the union, and a resident officer of the local division. Complainant complains that he has been deprived of certain alleged seniority rights by action of these respondents, and seeks redress in the courts for a violation thereof.

We pass by as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Simpson v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Greenwood v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. DeMille v. American Federation of Radio ArtistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wells v. Mobile County Bd. of Realtors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Ryan v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Aulich v. CraigmyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API