Legal Opinion
Brodsky v. Yahoo! Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 18, 2009No. C 08-02150 CWPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
In this securities fraud class action, Defendants Yahoo! Inc., Terry S. Semel, Susan L. Decker, Farzad Nazem and Daniel Rosensweig move to dismiss the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint (SAC). Lead Plaintiffs Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers and Pompano Beach Police and Firefighters’ Retirement Systems oppose the motion. The motion was heard on April 23, 2009. Having considered all of the parties’ papers and oral argument on the motion, the Court grants Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND 1
Defendant Yahoo! is a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- In re Solarcity Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- ScripsAmerica, Inc. v. Ironridge Global LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Leyte-Vidal v. SemelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Firefighters Pension & Relief Fund v. BulmahnDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.