Legal Opinion

Brown v. Parker

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 9, 1941No. 78PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, who is a packer of raisins in the State of California, instituted this action to restrain the enforcement of a prorate program for raisins prescribed under the authority of the California Agricultural Prorate Act, Chap. 754, p. 1969, Cal.Stats.1933 as amended, hereinafter called the Act. He has alleged and we hold that he has proved that the issues involve a *896sum in excess of $3,000, in that the State of California is attempting to enforce the provisions of the Act and is claiming penalties in the amount of $13,000 against the plaintiff.

It is plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Simpson v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Sligh v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
  2. Gray v. Commodity Credit CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
  3. Blue & Gold Stamps-U-Save Premium Co. v. SobieskiDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
  4. Devine v. Joshua Hendy CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. Horne v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API