Legal Opinion
Horne v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 12, 2012No. 10-15270PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
This appeal of a United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) administrative decision asks us to interpret and pass on the constitutionality of a food product reserve program authorized by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (“AMAA”), and implemented by the Marketing Order Regulating the Handling of Raisins Produced from Grapes Grown in California, 7 C.F.R. Part 989 (“Raisin Marketing Order” or “the Order”), first adopted in 1949. Farmers Marvin and Laura Horne (“the Hornes” 1 ) protest the USDA Judicial…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Horne v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014