Legal Opinion
The Hudson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 6, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Admiralty. Suit for damage to cargo.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
This libel was filed to recover damages to two consignments of tea, belonging to the libellant, a New York merchant, shipped on the steamship Hudson in December, 1900; one from Amoy, China, and the other from Yokohama, Japan. The steamship arrived in New York on March 20th, 1901.
The libelant claims that the teas were shipped in good order but, owing to the careless, negligent and improper manner in which they were stowed on board the steamship, they became impregnated and affected by foreign and injurious substances and odors, by reason of which they were seriously…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knott v. Botany MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ceballos v. The Warren AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- The PharosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- The James M. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- The VennerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The CaledonierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Lazarus v. BarberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
- The JeannieDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915