Legal Opinion
The Caledonier
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 7, 1929No. Nos. 78, 79PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Both appellees are cargo owners, who sued to recover for damages to their respective cargoes of bales of rabbit skins, claimed to have been sustained while being transported on a voyage from Antwerp to New York, arriving March 30, 1920. The bill of lading acknowledged receipt of all these bales in apparent good order and condition, and the evidence supports this claim. When the rabbit skins arrived, they were charred and wet, hot and steaming. Bales of rags in wet condition were stowed in the same compartment with the skins. The rags were stowed on top of and next to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Sea PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- The WaalhavenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Venezuelan Meat Export Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1935
- Daley v. HarberDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Sea PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.