Legal Opinion

Bowen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1989No. A89A0459PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

The record shows that on three separate occasions before the jury was impanelled in defendant’s trial for armed robbery, the court conducted proceedings to determine whether defendant wished to change his plea from not guilty to guilty. The first occasion concluded when defendant responded to the trial judge: “Start a trial.” On the second occasion, the defendant stood mute to the judge’s question as to how he wished to plead. Only after the judge instructed the clerk to bring in two jury panels for voir dire did the defendant respond: “Guilty.” Voir dire proceedings commenced…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Key v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Echols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Hibbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Anfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Greenhill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Dennis v. MaltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Loden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API