Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of A.A.E.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1998No. C6-97-1727PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
In challenging his adjudication for reckless discharge of a firearm, appellant A.A.E. argues that accidentally shooting the victim, with no knowledge that firing the rifle would cause the victim harm, does not fall within the conduct prohibited by Minn.Stat. § 609.66, subd. la(a)(2) (1996). The trial court adjudicated A.A.E. delinquent for intentionally discharging a firearm under circumstances that endanger the safety of another. We affirm.
FACTS
A.A.E. was charged with reckless discharge of a firearm in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.66, subd. la(a)(2) (1996). The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. OrselloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Homart Development Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Heaslip v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of A.A.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. GundersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012