Legal Opinion

Hilderbrand v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Appeal and Error, 4CJ, p. 872, n. 19; Commerce, 12CJ, p. 74, n. 97; Damages, 17CJ, p. 1073, n. 83; p. 1117, n. 17; Master and Servant, 39CJ, p. 265, n. 6; p. 690, n. 81; p. 710, n. 39; p. 734, n. 13; p. 1138, n. 76; Trial, 38Cyc, p. 1778, n. 73. This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employ of defendant. The verdict of the jury was for plaintiff, in the sum of $7000, and from the judgment rendered thereon, defendant, after an unavailing motion for a new trial, has duly perfected this appeal.

The petition alleged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wabash Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Page v. PayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Stoker v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Archibald v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Baird v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Jarvis v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Rogers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1988
  4. Davis v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Edmonston v. Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API