Legal Opinion

Edmonston v. Kansas City, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

-This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $1200 and defendant has appealed.

The facts show that plaintiff was injured on the 10th day of January, 1929, by stepping into a manhole in the nighttime, as he was going to his work at the Journal-Post Company building, in Kansas City. The manhole was located in a park or park property owned by the defendant.

Plaintiff alighted from a street car on Holmes street and proceeded west about a half a block along 22nd street, an east and west street in said city, to McCoy avenue, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Benton v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Healy v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Shippey v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Curran v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Grattan v. SuedmeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Husband v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Honeycutt v. Wabash Railroad CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Jackson v. Farmers Union Livestock CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Sheridan v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Brolin v. the City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API