Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1936No. File No. Cr. 130PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

The defendants were arraigned on a charge of extortion. They demurred to the information. The demurrer was overruled. They were tried and found guilty. They moved in arrest of judgment. The motion was denied and judgment of conviction was entered against them. Thereupon they appealed to this court. The appeal is on the judgment roll.

The information charged that the defendants conjointly “did wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously, with the consent of one Ward, induce him, the said Ward, by wrongful use of fear, to turn over to them an automobile, to wit: a 1929 Oldsmobile sedan. This contrary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. . CorbalisNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. WrightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SutterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  2. State v. PrinceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API