Venner v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal;? from the Circuit Court oí the United Ríales for the Eastern District of [¡Michigan. This case is an appeal from a decree dismissing the intervening petition of the appellant, Charles II. Vernier, filed in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding, wherein the Fanners’ Loan & Trust Company was complainant, and the Adrian Waterworks Company was sole defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal;? from the Circuit Court oí the United Ríales for the Eastern District of [¡Michigan. This case is an appeal from a decree dismissing the intervening petition of the appellant, Charles II. Vernier, filed in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding, wherein the Fanners’ Loan & Trust Company was complainant, and the Adrian Waterworks Company was sole defendant. The object of the foreclosure suit w*as to enforce a mortgage made August 1, 1888, by the waterworks company to the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, as trustee, to secure an issue of 200 bonds of Í81,000 each, with interest coupons…
1Opinion of the CourtLTJETOlSr, Circuit Judge
The claim of Venner is that he is entitled to priority of payment out of the proceeds resulting from the foreclosure of the mortgage made by the Adrian Waterworks Company to the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company. He endeavors to maintain his claim to a lien superior to the mortgagees — First, upon the ground that in all he did in respect to the improvement and enlargement of the old waterworks plant at Adrian, as well as in the' procurement of the decree of foreclosure in the old foreclosure casé against the old company, wherein his claim was given preference over the old 7 per cent, mortgage, he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wood v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Slide & Spur Gold Mines v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chilton v. Braiden's AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Harris v. Youngstown Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- J. P. Browder & Co. v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Slupsky v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Anderson v. Pennsylvania Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.