Rudisill v. Icenhour
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Defendants’ appeal is from an order of summary judgment permanently enjoining them from using an unopened subdivision street that borders plaintiffs’ property and denying their motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ action. The only conflict in the pleadings, affidavits, deeds, maps and other materials of record — that the materials, both parties, and the court sometimes refer to the principal defendant as Harold J. Icenhour and other times as Howard J. Icenhour — is immaterial to the case and should be resolved by the parties on their own. In other pertinent part the materials…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- McDaris v. Breit Bar" T" CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Russell v. CogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Johnson v. Skyline Telephone Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hensley v. SamelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Nelms v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Gaskill v. State ex rel. CobeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993