Legal Opinion · Dissent

HIKO Energy, LLC v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 2017No. HIKO Energy, LLC v. PA PUC - 5 C.D. 2016Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT

The Pennsylvania Public Utility. Commission (PUC) has imposed a civil penalty of $1,836,125 upon HIKO Energy, LLC (HIKO), an electric generation. supplier (EGS), because its invoices to 5,708 customers over a four-month period “did not reflect the marketed prices and agreed upon prices in the disclosure statement.” 52 Pa. Code § 54.4(a). This civil penalty, the highest in the history of utility regulation in Pennsylvania when ordered, is grossly disproportionate to the penalties of $25,000 to $125,000 imposed upon other EGSs for the same conduct…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Goodman AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API