Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodiek
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 17, 1941No. 67PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
Purporting to act pursuant to the terms of section 9 of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 9, the President of the United States in April 1924 allowed the claim of Johann Friedrich Hackfeld for the return of his property, or its proceeds, seized by the alien property custodian in 1918. Under this presidential order more than $3,-700,000 in cash and United States bonds were paid to Hackfeld between June 7, 1924, and August 20, 1931. After Hack-feld’s death the ancillary executor of his estate, appointed by the surrogate of New York county,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- In the Matter of Evelyn Halpern v. Warren C. Schwartz, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Isenberg v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- J. W. Bateson Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.