Legal Opinion

Fontaine v. Charas

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 5, 1935PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

At the trial neither party offered any evidence either as to the decedent’s conduct at the time of the accident or as to her knowledge of the dangerous situation created by the defendant when he stopped his car upon the traveled part of the highway. In fact the record shows no more than that the decedent was in the car at the time it was run into by Perreault, and that the car was at that time under the control of the defendant. Under these circumstances the issue of contributory negligence is not raised (P. L., c. 328, s. 13; Hayes v. Company, 86 N. H. 486, 491), and therefore the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  2. Flynn v. GordonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Tetreault v. GouldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. Hayes v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Weldy v. Town of KingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Dunbeck v. Exeter & Hampton Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Hernandez v. Pensacola Coach Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Danley v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API