Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1987No. Nos. 85-3640, 85-3643, 85-3644PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

These are actions brought by commercial borrowers against their bank, alleging violations of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1982), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 (1982). The district court granted the bank’s motions for summary judgment on the RICO claims and denied summary judgment on the antitrust claim. A jury returned verdicts in favor of the borrowers in their antitrust action. That verdict was subsequently overturned by the district court when it entered judgment notwithstanding the verdicts…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. Joe H. Liu, Individually and Doing Business as J L Fashions, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re: Citric Acid Litigation 7-Up Bottling Co.Of Jasper Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Harry E. Fleischhauer v. C. Elvin Feltner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Continental Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Phillips Petroleum Co. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. And Powerine Oil Co., State of California v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Atlantic Richfield Co. Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank of OregonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API