Tift v. Wight & Weslosky Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Spence. Dougherty superior court. October term, 1900.
1Opinion
Motion foe Behearing.
Little, J.
After the record in this case was considered, the decision of the court was expressed in the foregoing headnotes. As the questions which were raised were considered plain and well-established, it was not deemed necessary that the principles of law referred to in the headnotes should be elaborated. Since the delivery of the opinion of the court, counsel for plaintiffs in error have submitted a motion for a rehearing, and we have given to their petition a careful consideration, and in deference to the conviction, which they express in an elaborate brief, that a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. J. S. &. W. H. LatimerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Armour & Co. v. Ross & BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by29 opinions
- Funding Systems Leasing Corporation v. Garland B. Pugh, Sr., Individually and D/B/A Georgia Tractor and Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- McCrary v. PritchardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Walker & Rogers v. Malsby Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Marks & Powell v. Talmadge's Sons & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Hotel Candler Incorporated v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.