Legal Opinion

Lillienthal v. Caravita

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the CourtSteahAN, J.

Counsel for respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause for the following reasons: (1) That no appeal has been taken and perfected herein as by law required, in that all the adverse parties to this suit have not been served with any notice of appeal, nor made parties hereto, nor are they now before this court; (2) that the court has no jurisdiction herein, in that the alleged service of the notice of appeal upon the defendants’ and respondents’ attorney has not been properly made, nor is it of such a service as is by law required.

The object of this suit was to set…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Thompson v. EllsworthNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. DelahuntOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Moody v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Shirley v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Conrad v. Pacific Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API