Legal Opinion
State v. Eichhorst
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2008No. 28A01-0707-CR-310PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Judge.
The State of Indiana appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion to suppress filed by Ali Eichhorst. The State raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting Eichhorst’s motion to suppress the results of the hospital’s blood alcohol tests, which were obtained by the State pursuant to an investigatory subpoena duces tecum. We reverse and remand.
The relevant facts follow. In the early morning hours of April 15, 2006, Eichhorst was driving a vehicle with her younger sister, Tara Eichhorst, as a passenger. Eichhorst’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.Indiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Shepherd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Abney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Oman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- State v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- People v. PopeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- People v. BauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- State v. WeilertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.