Legal Opinion

St. Clair Prosecutor v. American Federation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1986No. Docket Nos. 72125, 74974, 75365. (Calendar Nos. 5, 6)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

This matter poses the following questions: whether the circuit court had jurisdiction to decide the arbitrability of an assistant prosecuting attorney’s (apa) removal from office under a collective bargaining agreement entered into by the county and the union without the participation of the prosecuting attorney; whether the prosecutor is a coemployer with the county; whether the public employment relations act affects the power of the prosecutor under MCL 49.41-49.43; MSA 5.801-5.803, the statute which provides that an apa shall hold office "during the pleasure of the prosecuting attorney…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Carol Conklin v. Leo E. Lovely Joe W. Wakeley and John HussCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Mollett v. City of TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hetrick v. FriedmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API