Touche Ross & Co. v. Canaveral International Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HUBBART, Judge.
By this appeal, we are asked to review a trial court order denying a motion to dismiss an action based on the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the person as to the defendant Touche Ross & Co., a New York partnership, which has both Florida resident partners and out-of-state partners. We have jurisdiction to review this non-final order. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i).
In our view, the defendant Touche Ross & Co. was not properly served in this cause under Section 48.061(1), Florida Statutes (1977), because the Florida resident partners of the defendant herein were served…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- I. Epstein & Brother v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Speight v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Hayman v. WeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Heritage Corp. of So. Fla. v. Apartment Invest., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goforit Entertainment LLC v. Digimedia.com L.P.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007