Legal Opinion

Overton v. Tarkington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1959No. 162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

It is not asserted the contract sued on is a negotiable instrument. Plaintiff seeks to recover as an assignee of a chose in action. The rights of the parties are to be determined on that assertion.

Plaintiff, as an assignee, is by statute, G.S. 1-57, given the right to maintain the action in his name but that right is circumscribed by the express provision that it shall be without prejudice to any offset or other defense existing at the time of the assignment.

Plaintiff does not challenge the right of defendants to assert a usurious charge included in the instrument sued on with the right to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McCollum v. Hamilton National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Planters National Bank of Virginia v. Wysong & Miles Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Ward v. . SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Crosrol Carding Developments, Inc. v. Gunter & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. CREDIGY RECEIVABLES, INC. v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Christiani v. PopovichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company v. CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API