Legal Opinion
Roque v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 10, 2009No. Civil 3:09cv533 (JBA)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. # 13]
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Pedro Roque, the father of Edward Roque and the administrator of his estate, brought suit on April 3, 2009 against the United States, raising wrongful death and survival claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), based on the Government’s alleged negligence resulting in the assault on and death of Edward Roque on September 2, 2005. The Government has moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) as barred by the two-year…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Kronisch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Louise Drazan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Beavin v. William W. Backus HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Dominique Phillips and The Wendler Family v. United States Postal Service, A/K/A or D/B/A: “United States”District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Petersen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Petersen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.