Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Yentzer. Same v. Goodrich

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1877No. 161PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

Modifications or alterations in an invention consisting in a combination of old ingredients, which merely substitutes another old ingredient for one of the ingredients in the patented combination, is an infringement of the patent, if the substitute performs the same function and was well known at the date of the patent as a proper substitute for the one omitted from the patented invention; but the rule is otherwise if the ingredient substituted is a new one, or performs a substantially different function, or was not known at the date of the patent as a proper substitute for the one omitted…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bardoff v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Waters v. Security Life & Annuity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Ralph N. Brodie Co. v. Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Stilwell-Bierce & Smith-Vaile Co. v. Eufaula Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Daniels v. . HomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API