Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Daniels v. . Homer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR and WALKER JJ., dissenting. The General Assembly of 1905 enacted chapter (220) 292, "To regulate fishing in Albemarle and Pamlico sounds and waters connected with them." The first five sections of that chapter define and regulate the manner of fishing in various sections of the sounds. Section 6 (marked 5 in the printed act) is as follows: "That it shall be unlawful for any person to set or fish any net or appliance of any kind for catching fish within one mile on north or south side of a line five miles long, running west from center of New Inlet or Oregon Inlet, or on north or south…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Colon v. . LiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. DerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Cervecería Corona, Inc. v. LizardiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API